Home > geek > How to Tweet Your Way Out of a Job

How to Tweet Your Way Out of a Job

oops

Photo credit: Victoria-Ann

I saw this exchange on Twitter, which is a painful lesson in how NOT to use Twitter in this tough economy.

A lucky job applicant tweeted the following:

Cisco just offered me a job! Now I have to weigh the utility of a fatty paycheck against the daily commute to San Jose and hating the work.

This tweet caught the attention of Tim Levad, a channel partner advocate for Cisco. To which he responded:

Who is the hiring manager. I’m sure they would love to know that you will hate the work. We here at Cisco are versed in the web.

Ouch! The person who dissed the Cisco offer quickly took their Twitter account private. But Twitter search retained the record.

Remember a couple months ago when the PR guy’s tweet about Memphis came back to bite him? This is another example of the need to be careful with what you post on Twitter, and social media in general.

Categories: geek Tags: , ,
  1. March 17, 2009 at 12:53 pm | #1

    Measure Twice…Cut Once. No one seems to get it do they?

    • March 20, 2009 at 11:03 am | #2

      That is a great analogy. I wish everybody followed that advice!!

      TheCommentDepot.com

  2. March 17, 2009 at 1:02 pm | #3

    How many times do you have to tell ppl: Social Media is NOT a back channel!! lol

  3. March 17, 2009 at 1:19 pm | #4

    Thanks for sharing the story.

    It’s stunning to think that some of those savvy enough to be using the tools can still not factor in the enormous reach of the message.

    Two other posts somewhat along these lines for those interested in the topic…

    First – mine (apologies for shameless plug here, Hutch)- I posted some thoughts around the blurring of work / life in the online realm and got some great comments from the community – http://tinyurl.com/cjyhzf

    I also came across this post from Lisa Hickey where she provides thoughts on public, semi public and private convos – http://tinyurl.com/clqfgg

    Thanks for sharing the story! A good reminder of what NOT to do… EVER.

  4. March 17, 2009 at 1:23 pm | #5

    is that a shoe in @theconnor ’s mouth? looks like he couldn’t get his foot out of his mouth quickly enough.

    • stuartduff
      March 17, 2009 at 3:59 pm | #6

      lmfao yeah looks like a shoe now ya mention it

  5. March 17, 2009 at 1:23 pm | #7

    Wow what a bonehead move. But a great lesson for everyone. There is no place on the interwebs where you can’t be found!

  6. Jez
    March 17, 2009 at 1:30 pm | #8

    EPIC FAIL!

    “NEVER WRITE ANYTHING ON THE INTERNET THAT YOU WOULDN’T WANT TO SEE WRITTEN ON YOUR GRAVE”

    remember that, and you will never go wrong!

    • oren
      March 18, 2009 at 7:30 am | #9

      @jez: I suppose you would like to see “epic fail” written on your grave?

      • ken
        March 18, 2009 at 10:18 am | #10

        Actually, given the kind of circumstances that might lead to needing a gravestone, “epic fail” might be totally appropriate.

      • March 18, 2009 at 11:14 am | #11

        YES +1

      • March 18, 2009 at 11:57 am | #12

        I wouldn’t mind haveing EPIC FAIL on my grave… I would like that

      • Sir Odd
        March 19, 2009 at 6:11 am | #13

        It would certainly make people far more curious as to how you died.

      • museumonkey
        November 11, 2009 at 6:58 am | #14

        Would it beat LOL?

    • March 18, 2009 at 1:11 pm | #15

      written on your grave, or in this case, on your resume.

    • hoopla
      March 18, 2009 at 4:27 pm | #16

      Written on my grave is not an issue, the dead don’t care. Don’t say anything you wouldn’t want your mother to read.

      • Rayn
        March 31, 2009 at 5:23 pm | #17

        Then we’d have no great literature then if that were the case

    • dnono
      March 19, 2009 at 8:02 am | #18

      Yeehaw! That means I can write anything I want to online given my plans for cremation.

    • Morris
      March 19, 2009 at 8:03 am | #19

      “NEVER WRITE ANYTHING ON THE INTERNET THAT YOU WOULDN’T WANT TO SEE WRITTEN ON YOUR GRAVE” – that’s going to be my new email sig.

  7. March 17, 2009 at 1:34 pm | #20

    As a Cisco employee I know we’re doing almost no hiring right now. I sure hope we’re saving our precious few openings for the precious future coworkers who would relish them. As for that lack of Twitter savvy, nothing to add to the bashing that’s begun.

  8. haha
    March 17, 2009 at 3:59 pm | #21

    @Jez sed:

    “EPIC FAIL!

    NEVER WRITE ANYTHING ON THE INTERNET THAT YOU WOULDN’T WANT TO SEE WRITTEN ON YOUR GRAVE”

    you want EPIC FAIL! written on your grave? :p couldn’t resist :)

    • Rashmi
      March 18, 2009 at 4:27 am | #22

      Good one! :)

    • Anonymous
      March 18, 2009 at 9:05 am | #23

      That would rule. As a matter of fact, i’m putting that in my will. My name, the dates and “Epic Fail”

    • rob
      March 18, 2009 at 11:58 am | #24

      Rather on the tombstone than on my name plate.

    • March 19, 2009 at 6:58 am | #25

      Better ‘Epic Fail’ than ‘Oops I guess that light was red’

    • Rayn
      March 31, 2009 at 5:22 pm | #26

      I want EPIC FAIL on my grave…that’s soo cool..Million dollar idea!

  9. March 17, 2009 at 4:18 pm | #27

    honesty vs. political correctness ..

  10. March 17, 2009 at 4:26 pm | #28

    How is it remotely possible that someone who just spent a million years in college (yes i saw her resume) could accept their first “career” job with a company as large/prestigious as Cisco and then have an attitude like that? I guess that is someone who REALLY LOVES school.

  11. moo
    March 17, 2009 at 5:15 pm | #29

    All signs point to the fact that this was a blessing in disguise for the Cisco…from a previous tweet…”theconnor oh no oh no. just realized i can watch netflix on demand AT WORK. stay tuned for when i repeat this revelation in class tomorrow.”

  12. March 17, 2009 at 6:36 pm | #30

    I don’t have anything new to say that hasn’t already been said, but gah. Think, people. Think.

  13. March 17, 2009 at 6:45 pm | #31

    yikes. good lesson.

  14. March 17, 2009 at 7:00 pm | #32

    This is like a new type of Darwinism, the tech version.

    • March 18, 2009 at 1:30 am | #33

      This comment made me laugh. This person was ungrateful and needs a career change if her work doesn’t please her. As Jon Stewart would say, “our wealth comes from our work.”

    • It’s How I See It
      March 18, 2009 at 10:13 am | #34

      You are so right.

  15. March 17, 2009 at 7:02 pm | #35

    All I have to say is Duh!

  16. March 17, 2009 at 7:19 pm | #36

    Once again public snarkiness gone wild!

    what seems like simple sense just tends to fly out the window at times!

  17. Louise
    March 17, 2009 at 7:24 pm | #37

    I saw that tweet and thought that it was a pretty bone headed move on the part of the person. i guess they did not learn too much in school.

  18. March 17, 2009 at 7:24 pm | #38

    If I could ONLY point out the some of the things I have seen people tweet. I can’t now – but I saved links and I will one day. Seriously think before you Tweet !

  19. Jason Rockwood
    March 17, 2009 at 7:33 pm | #39

    There is not a “right way” or a “wrong way” to use Twitter. This girl used Twitter like most people: she said what was on her mind. That her transparent admission of her dislike of work had repercussions should not lead to opacity in her communication.

    • Respondant
      March 18, 2009 at 3:25 am | #40

      The problem Jason is that she clearly wasn’t “transparent” in her conversation with Cisco – otherwise they would never have offered her a job. People need to understand that not only are they broadcasting on twitter – potentially to everyone – but that it also is recorded and can later be used against you.

  20. March 17, 2009 at 7:36 pm | #41

    I love my job!

  21. Meg
    March 17, 2009 at 8:13 pm | #42

    Haha! That’s awesome! I’m in favor of transparency and honest communications. But Mama always said if you can’t say anything nice…

  22. jbg
    March 17, 2009 at 9:30 pm | #43

    cisco employees are just upset theconner pointed out the reality of working in stale old cisco.

  23. March 17, 2009 at 9:44 pm | #44

    Wow!
    Poor bloke! I know millions who think and feel that way on the bus or in a plane, but to tweet is to get caught, I guess.

    It is not about what you think, but about who hears your thoughts. It needs serious guts to be honest on the net.

    BTW: I love my work, I love the pay, I love it more and more each day…. and so on.

    • March 20, 2009 at 11:35 am | #45

      An off topic comment, but not too far off.

      So I’m a facebook junky and well twitter is my new high. On facebook, the amount of people complaining about work is almost uncountable. I should say that the number of people on facebook

      As with all technologies that connect you to the WWW, you have to monitor what you say, especially if it’s critical. poltical, or planin old complaining.

      Some things should be kept to yourself.

  24. March 17, 2009 at 10:24 pm | #46

    I almost did that for a college project & was so close to getting in trouble with the prof. Thats the problem with the social web i guess -you cant just undo your actions !

    • March 20, 2009 at 11:38 am | #47

      You can undo your actions on Twitter. Just delete the update.

      • April 7, 2009 at 6:39 am | #48

        You can’t undelete a tweet once it’s been copied and archived on a hiring manager’s gray matter database.

  25. andrewkurka
    March 17, 2009 at 11:00 pm | #49

    I think some are really starting too take it uselessly over board.

    http://www.andrewkurka.wordpress.com

  26. March 17, 2009 at 11:51 pm | #50

    Great entry! It’s funny when new tools come to our disposal that it seems to take us time before we use it with caution. I remember hearing similar horror stories when email was introduced. When will we learn? Nice blog. Take care Alan

  27. March 17, 2009 at 11:55 pm | #51

    yes well i hope people learn from this. i heared of a woman writing in her blog what she does all day at work and was fired after that as well.
    have to be careful with writing on the internet.. things can backfire.

    • rick
      March 18, 2009 at 10:27 am | #52

      Yeah, it’s like the web is.. public or something.

      Sigh.

  28. indiapolitics2009
    March 18, 2009 at 12:00 am | #53

    I almost did that for a college project & was so close to getting in trouble with the prof. Thats the problem with the social web i guess -you cant just undo your actions

  29. sharynmunrovirtualassistance
    March 18, 2009 at 12:21 am | #54

    It’s just a bit too easy to forget you’re not just talking to your friends when using social media.

  30. March 18, 2009 at 12:28 am | #55

    They’ve not quite covered their trail.

    http://www.google.com/search?q=%22connor%20riley%22+berkeley

  31. March 18, 2009 at 12:53 am | #56

    Thats just priceless…

  32. stefonic
    March 18, 2009 at 1:00 am | #57

    I think a job at Cisco is boring and I would hate it too, but I need to refrain from saying that as I need the fatty paycheck,…….ooops!

  33. Courtney
    March 18, 2009 at 1:03 am | #58

    .. PWNT.

  34. Geroin
    March 18, 2009 at 1:05 am | #59

    A Dutch politician got publicly slapped today on the national news, because he privately twitted a racist Twit.. and he apologised on his Tweetfeed

  35. March 18, 2009 at 1:16 am | #60

    Nice one! Although some sees SOCIAL NETWORKING as a means to express and speak their minds same as what I do, again, caution has to be observed because people aren’t born to think alike! Some may take a post positively while others may take it as a painful and offending. Thus, WITH TWEET POWER COMES TWEET RESPONSIBILITY.

    http://ryanericsongcanlas.wordpress.com

  36. March 18, 2009 at 1:16 am | #61

    Whoa, quite a lesson for all tweeters!

  37. Helen
    March 18, 2009 at 1:32 am | #62

    My b rother id something like this, he went on a mini rant about his line manager on facebook. He didnt loose his job but he was going to be demoted… only then they realised they didnt have anyone to replace him on his department. lol! hes still there now but the manager has gone!

    Its not about being politically correct, its about realising who MIGHT be reading what you post. everyone has the right to free speech but this guy wouldent have sat in the interview and said that he supposed the money would make up for the fact that he didnt want to be there in the first place.

    I dont think anyone can afford to be picky about a job at the moment. I know i cant!! But even if i get the worst job in the world i will be grateful for the income and definatly wouldent complain about it!!

  38. March 18, 2009 at 1:44 am | #63

    interesting story and funny too, too bad for some people that tweets are being saved in Twitter search after you delete them, also too bad if you by accident post a DM as a regular tweet (like sometimes happens with TwitterFox)

  39. March 18, 2009 at 2:05 am | #64

    A blessing in disguise: this person just saved himself from a job he hated. Now, he can concentrate on finding what he really wants.

    • Sandokan
      March 23, 2009 at 2:06 am | #65

      Exactly what I thought! Thank God for accidental honesty! I hate my job too. I pray every day that my boss would fire me!

  40. March 18, 2009 at 2:06 am | #66

    what a pity!

  41. srutsam
    March 18, 2009 at 2:15 am | #67

    Actually pity the guy, but he definitely should’ve been careful. Well, he was sure he’d hate the job anyway, so guess it’s alright?

  42. March 18, 2009 at 2:20 am | #68

    Thanks For Sharing, FromKampanye Damai Pemilu Indonesia 2009

  43. March 18, 2009 at 2:22 am | #69

    PR guys, who are they?
    ~Ehtie~

  44. nelsonleith
    March 18, 2009 at 2:30 am | #70

    Yeah, let Cisco (or any organization) fire everyone who hates their job. Or, let them only select employees who are willing to lie for money. That should work out okay, right?

    Levad’s threat not only displays an incredible naivete about the realities of managing a workforce, but also a top-down smugness typical of plutocratic command economics.

    In a free market, Tim, employees are allowed to weigh their options. Economic exchanges between free actors are compromises by necessity: Levad should get over it or do us all a favor and get out of business.

    • March 18, 2009 at 9:38 pm | #71

      Exactly. The twitterer did herself a double favor by not working at CISCO. No wonder they have to pay a ton of money to new hires. The place must be truly horrific.

  45. March 18, 2009 at 2:35 am | #72

    Doesn’t it just show the arrogance – and perhaps complacency of Gen Y? Too few people are prepared to take responsibility for their social media presence, and assume they can cruise through life without any negativity sticking to them.

    • March 18, 2009 at 9:37 pm | #73

      Just in case you hadn’t noticed, the workforce is going to shrink quite a bit and Gen Y is going to be facing enormous demand. You bet they’re going to be able to dictate all the terms of employment.

  46. March 18, 2009 at 2:43 am | #74

    So, it was a woman then?

    That makes sense. Speak first, think later.

    Heh! ;-)

  47. March 18, 2009 at 3:08 am | #75

    Wow. That’s horrible. He needs reputation management now, we are great with cleaning up reputations on the web. ;-)

    Side note:If I where the blog post owner. I’d edit that link because too many people are tweeting ‘cisco fatty’. Instead, I’d link to http://search.twitter.com/search?q=cisco+fatty+theconnor

  48. March 18, 2009 at 3:10 am | #76

    Well it will make an interesting addition to that persons CV/Resume. Employment History: Cisco 17/03/09 12:00 – 17/03/09 12:01, Skills: ‘I am fully versed in the pitfalls of Social Media’.

    May I just take this opportunity to say I love the company I work for :)

  49. lindamargaretbroughton
    March 18, 2009 at 3:12 am | #77

    The frustration is, however, that you want to create content that is interesting and generates discussion. Sometimes, it’s obvious not to say anything regarding a topic, but often, you want to post in order to create discussion but not brand you for life. How to balance the two? How to avoid mundane commentary but not to overtly offend?

  50. ruiseart
    March 18, 2009 at 3:13 am | #78

    this story tell me many things, but one in particular. propriety is lacking with some people. these devices enable some people to continue to keep acting like a 2 year old with a secret. they have to blurt it out immediately. guess what? most people do not really care what other people are thinking SECOND to SECOND. put the device down and back away slowly. go see someone face to face every once in a while.

  51. al
    March 18, 2009 at 3:19 am | #80

    If Cisco takes the cowardly road and just drops the guy instead of asking themselves hard questions about why someone might not enjoy the work they lose, not him.

  52. March 18, 2009 at 3:39 am | #81

    Another bad day for Twitter!

  53. typecat
    March 18, 2009 at 3:41 am | #82

    We’ll need a term for this kind of thing. We had ‘Dooced’ when people got fired for writing on their blogs at the turn of the century. Twitted, perhaps?

  54. guilfordcyndi
    March 18, 2009 at 3:42 am | #83

    Why do people think they’re invisible on the internet? It’s amazing…

  55. March 18, 2009 at 3:43 am | #84

    So many folks always want to jump on the newest band wagons. Anything electronic,tweet,facebook,myspace,cell phones etc. They don’t read rules and information,they just want to flap their jaws. If you want something to say personal, get a land-line. You know the phone that is attached to your home. *giggles*

  56. March 18, 2009 at 3:51 am | #85

    wow, scary stuff.
    Maybe I will rave about my job just before salary review and see what happens.

  57. March 18, 2009 at 3:53 am | #86

    Should I praise my boss and my company everyday on my blog and twitter?

  58. March 18, 2009 at 3:58 am | #87

    nice post and lesson to learn from. it shows that in this new era of the web (web 2.0) nothing is hidden. Whatever you write online now, is beeing veiwed by the whole 2 billion internet users.

    A good one to learn from.

  59. March 18, 2009 at 3:58 am | #88

    This Tweet caught my attention. It makes me wonder if the original Cisco update is someone’s idea of a joke

    godhammer: Nortel just offered me a job! Now I have to weigh the utility of a fatty paycheck against the daily commute to Canada & hating the work #ORM

  60. halotoy4kids
    March 18, 2009 at 3:59 am | #89

    Wow, interesting story and funny too. Thanks For Sharing.

  61. March 18, 2009 at 4:05 am | #90

    I am sure that guy must be repenting about his tweet now :)

    But its very imperative that one needs to be careful while using social media or the internet. Many times people forget that they are being too personal on the web. Probably, the addictiveness to the internet is the cause for this. I remember that Reuters had stated that 70 percent of Americans turn to the web for news as they believe that traditional journalism is out of touch. And after reading some news or interesting facts, people get drifted and end up in doing something stupid on the web.

    This simple visual explains how you can get punished when Social Media goes to the court. Take a look here – http://vizedu.com/2009/02/social-media-goes-to-court/

  62. March 18, 2009 at 4:08 am | #91

    That’s a self owning if ever I saw one. I don’t use Facebook or Twitter, because I’m not interested in telling everybody everything I’m doing at any given time and I don’t want to know the same about everyone else. Social networking sites are like a window into people’s lives, and sometimes you don’t like what you see in those windows.

    Maybe the guy can check out my Making Money Online blog now he is unemployed – http://homesuccesstips.wordpress.com/

  63. Jo-Jo the Clown
    March 18, 2009 at 4:13 am | #92

    Bob Nardelli might be really interested in embarrassing public information on Tim Levad. Is Cisco so out-of-work that they waste time on tattle-tales?

  64. March 18, 2009 at 4:15 am | #93

    *OWNED*

    Well done! Muppet…

  65. March 18, 2009 at 4:25 am | #94

    Twitter just made this easier, but it simply shows that this person is not professional anyways. If you don’t want the job don’t waste people’s time in interviews. There are more people out there who want it and are enthusiastic.

  66. Cecily (Eric the Fruitbat)
    March 18, 2009 at 4:27 am | #95

    Wow… that sucks… tsk tsk tsk tsk… that’s why I never tweet publicly when its a negative one… hahahahaha

  67. helmet head
    March 18, 2009 at 4:31 am | #96

    That’s what you get for using Twitter: http://decentcommunity.org/2009/03/10/twitter-is-too-much/

  68. March 18, 2009 at 4:48 am | #97

    Always be careful what you put out on the internet, because it’s there forevor.

  69. March 18, 2009 at 4:52 am | #98

    Good lessons, but shouldn’t Cisco also worry about why the applicant feel that way?

  70. Jo
    March 18, 2009 at 5:05 am | #99

    Ouch!

  71. HeatherL
    March 18, 2009 at 5:06 am | #100

    Another reason to use caution when tweeting or posting on any SM platform is that employers are routinely searching the ‘verse on job applicants as part of due diligence. What do you think a potential empoyers reaction is to posts about how drunk/stoned etc you got last night or the current level of your sexual appetite. These searches aren’t technically legal for determining eligibity for a job – HR has a don’t ask-don’t tell philosophy here, and if it’s done behind the scenes the applicant may never know why they weren’t offered a job.

  72. March 18, 2009 at 5:06 am | #101

    The question is: if he hated the job, why did he take it?

    • March 19, 2009 at 1:21 pm | #102

      The REALLY big question is: If he’s going to hate that kind of work, why did he spend all that time & money going to college getting a degree in that field?

  73. March 18, 2009 at 5:12 am | #103

    This is an eye opener abotu what you should and should not tweet about.

    You have to wonder what was going through his mind. I mean he had to now that someone would have seen it and that it would get back to his boss.

  74. March 18, 2009 at 5:17 am | #104

    LOL, Cisco could have had some real fun stringing that one along. Luckily they have integrity and stung the applicant straight up ;-)

  75. March 18, 2009 at 5:30 am | #105

    Awesome that some smarta55 set up this account, http://twitter.com/CiscoFatty to memorialize the event.

  76. March 18, 2009 at 5:40 am | #106

    Twooce.

  77. March 18, 2009 at 5:46 am | #107

    Man, was that ever a bone head move. No one realizes the power if Indexing, ha!

  78. March 18, 2009 at 5:50 am | #108

    Fool. The man is a fool.

  79. March 18, 2009 at 5:54 am | #109

    Just tweeted this. Didn’t realize it was so popular already. @niceguyted

  80. Jay Wigley
    March 18, 2009 at 5:58 am | #110

    The real lesson here is not to “be careful with Twitter” but to be careful with what situations you accept. If some jobs would make you super unhappy, then take your life and fix it so you most likely never have to work like that. Everyone who’s advising others to avoid the truth is way off base.

  81. jeffespo
    March 18, 2009 at 6:08 am | #111

    The things that people post are just amazing. If the person is smart enough to want to use Twitter for the benefit, they have to assume that companies are using it for their benefit as well.

    Who wants an employee that is going to bash the brand image before filling out tax forms?

  82. March 18, 2009 at 6:16 am | #112

    What is shocking to me is that people never learn this lesson.

    I can tell people first hand employers will look at their MySpace’s and hey, if your MySpace is private, we’ll look at your current status message and your personal quote if thats not private too..

    People will say the most insane things and think nobody else would/could be looking for them..

  83. michaelbungartz
    March 18, 2009 at 6:20 am | #113

    It’s apparent that he wasn’t thrilled about taking the job. He asked, and the universe answered.

    Oops…

  84. March 18, 2009 at 6:25 am | #114

    Another example of nail the interview, fail the job. It’s no surprise that so many applicants are showing up well during the hiring process given all the coaching and advice that is available. But showing up well on the job is a whole different candy bar. “Hate the work” would have failed but would he/she have ever been fired?

    • Robin
      March 28, 2009 at 4:48 pm | #115

      That makes you wonder then if there are good people out there who aren’t quite as skilled at interviewing.

  85. March 18, 2009 at 6:26 am | #116

    opaaaaaaa .. that’s a shame

  86. bl1y
    March 18, 2009 at 6:29 am | #117

    I’ve never tweeted, so maybe someone can explain it, but how would Tim Levad have even see the tweet? If I update my gmail or facebook status, the only people seeing it are my friends. Even if it’s not private, it’s not going to show up on my boss’s newsfeed (since we’re not friended).

    Can you just do a search of all tweets for Cisco or whatever to see who’s tweeting about you?

  87. March 18, 2009 at 6:45 am | #119

    that is all to hilarious… how does anyone not know that once you say something, it is forever out there on the web, there is NO delete or erase function on the web, nice

  88. wisemar
    March 18, 2009 at 6:52 am | #120

    I don’t the fault in this is with Twitter or social media in general. If the person was so obvious with their dislike for the job as to state it in such a public forum it probably would have come out in another forum anyway. I’ve sat at my work and listened to co-workers take phone interviews for other jobs on the company’s recorded line…doi!

  89. mskeel
    March 18, 2009 at 6:54 am | #121

    Here’s a flip side to that. If all these managers Tweet, how about posting your availability, skill set, location, etc.

    I have done contract work for too long (no perks, no bennies), and would now like to find a FT perm position, but so are a boatload of other folks.

    Comments, suggestions, warnings ??

  90. hillaryyoung
    March 18, 2009 at 6:57 am | #122

    Common sense people! I’m starting to think there needs to be a mandatory “how not to use social media” seminar.
    Heck, make that “how to not use the internet.” Duh.

  91. March 18, 2009 at 7:00 am | #123

    All these people chiding Cisco for not embracing transparency or railing against the tyranny of political correctness are missing the point.

    She’s welcome to dread work as much as the next person. But when she publicly insults her (would-be) employer, she’s showing really bad judgment.

    As a manager, I don’t want someone working for me who doesn’t have the good sense to know when to use discretion. As an employer, how can I trust she won’t tank a multi-million dollar deal with that big mouth of hers?

    The job offer shouldn’t be rescinded because she was being too honest; it should be rescinded because she proved she’s too immature for the job.

    Impulse control – it does your career prospects good.

  92. March 18, 2009 at 7:06 am | #124

    Entertaining post. Thanks. :-)

  93. March 18, 2009 at 7:10 am | #125

    Good lesson learned. People don’t realize how powerful messaging via the web can be!

  94. March 18, 2009 at 7:23 am | #126

    That was rather dumb and rash of him. Bet he’s kicking himself. I’m sure he lost the job mostly because he showed how naive he is but also beause he underestimated the company – everyone is keyed to the web these days even the bosses.

  95. March 18, 2009 at 7:25 am | #127

    What’s up with thouse peoples common sense?

  96. March 18, 2009 at 7:26 am | #128

    it’s so funny that i stumbled upon this just now. in a mtg that we just had we were warned to be more careful with the content of our status’ on social networking sites.

    great post and everyone beware! just because we do have the first amendment, it’s not as protected as we thought!

  97. March 18, 2009 at 7:39 am | #129

    “Same player try again!”

    Honestly she must have been a newbie to Twitter. A more explicit disclaimer should tell the new users teh difference between public updates and private’s.

    twitter.com/novoseek

  98. Morgan
    March 18, 2009 at 7:40 am | #130

    Ouch! That sucks! But really that guy is an idiot.

  99. Jame
    March 18, 2009 at 7:48 am | #131

    And Cisco’s on Facebook too (and using it it for recruiting). People should be careful what they post.

  100. Gwarf
    March 18, 2009 at 8:02 am | #132

    Everyone is so uptight. The better question is why do you hate the work? Lots of people hate their jobs.

    • eemoore80
      March 18, 2009 at 5:46 pm | #133

      true.
      agreed.
      and why not decide that it wouldn’t be a good fit and move on, you know?
      but it’s a converation we should be having, indeed.

  101. March 18, 2009 at 8:14 am | #134

    You would be amazed at how many clients we get that want us to “hit the back button” for them. It’s nothing new from bad press to posted blogs. There are ways of doing it but with Twitter it’s more complicated.

    I do have one comment about the post. I may sound like a salty ol woman but, **getting on podium** in today’s society where jobs are scarce and employment on the Internet is a do or die experience, why can’t people appreciate the simple things? I mean this kid gets a job with a huge company and he freaking complains. Hello… Do you know how many people would love to get a job PERIOD?

    Look I know It’s not easy working for yourself. It takes discipline, time, and a strategy. Everyone wants to see the fruits of their labor, well then learn how to promote yourself with a clean, forward thinking brand. **getting off my podium**

  102. March 18, 2009 at 8:25 am | #135

    This is why I tweet under an alias. I don’t want a future employer to profile me based on my twitter history.

  103. Daria
    March 18, 2009 at 8:26 am | #136

    Seriously? I think some people think Twitter is like being in a car – you can say/do what you want and you think nobody will notice.. =)

  104. March 18, 2009 at 8:31 am | #137

    Ha Ha, great story about maybe not letting all you thoughts be public on social networks !

  105. lam
    March 18, 2009 at 8:43 am | #138

    oh..no…

  106. Dawna
    March 18, 2009 at 8:43 am | #139

    OUCH! Big mistake made there!

  107. christineblogz115
    March 18, 2009 at 8:47 am | #140

    Wow, Big Brother is watching.

  108. March 18, 2009 at 8:53 am | #141

    Reminds me of the slacking employee who bragged about it on Facebook after calling in sick.

  109. March 18, 2009 at 8:57 am | #142

    The internet: You’re not allowed to express your true feelings because it might upset somebody.

  110. Bunny ❤
    March 18, 2009 at 9:09 am | #143

    uh oh!
    wow thanks for bringing that to my attention.
    i write on my twitter about how many hours i have left until i get to go home. don’t get me wrong, i love my job, but damn. hmm, can you seriously get fired for even writing ~that~?

  111. March 18, 2009 at 9:13 am | #144

    This is not the first embarrassing- private-admission-gone-public story I have read as a result of social media, nor will it be the last. I just hope I don’t have to read one about myself.

    Peter R

  112. March 18, 2009 at 9:15 am | #145

    Some people are just naive. Simple as that. If it’s in the public domain, it’s in the public domain. Slag people off and they will see it. Mind you, works for me.

  113. drudo182
    March 18, 2009 at 9:19 am | #146

    I’ve heard about this type of thing happening on sites like Facebook and stuff. People need to be more grateful for the chances they are giving, even if they hate the work. Nice post.

  114. Employed Elsewhere
    March 18, 2009 at 9:22 am | #147

    Geez, it was just a casual remark, maybe the person that twitted that just has pre-job jitters.

    Obviously the hiring manager things she will be a good addition there. Since when do you have to love or even like your job?

    I hate my night job with the intensity of a thousand suns, but I am more productive than most people there.

  115. Kane
    March 18, 2009 at 9:34 am | #148

    It is a good reminder. That on any social network we should watch what we put out their. No one know who could be reading and looking at what you put up. Losing that Cisco job is the most painful thing that could happen at this time.

  116. dorothysantos
    March 18, 2009 at 9:39 am | #149

    Great post! Thanks for that. It is a great reminder!

  117. March 18, 2009 at 10:21 am | #150

    When I read “Cisco fatty” it makes me think of Crisco. Who apparently were not involved in any way.

  118. March 18, 2009 at 10:27 am | #151

    On the bright side, his weighty decision is resolved!

  119. March 18, 2009 at 10:29 am | #152

    “timmy” looks like a bit of a psycho – I’m sure I’ve seen that picture on America’s most wanted.

    It’s best to have 2 online personalities, your real self where you tell the world how great the company you work for is and wish you could just work even harder than you already do cos you love them so much…
    The other is anonymous and you use it to tell the truth.
    I don’t work for Cisco but I do hate my job, if I ever do work for Cisco I’ll probably hate that one too.

  120. Employed Elsewhere
    March 18, 2009 at 10:31 am | #153

    Where does it say that he or she lost the job offer? The way I read it, somebody claiming to work at Cisco wanted to know who the jhiring manager was, and that was the end of it.

  121. March 18, 2009 at 10:55 am | #154

    Incredible. When will people learn? I am simultaneously laughing and shaking my head. Sounds like CISCO may have caught a break finding out what kind of guy @theconnor is before he started working for them.

    Expensive lesson for @theconnor though. And he should have known better.

  122. March 18, 2009 at 11:23 am | #155

    Wow! Some people never know when to draw the line between their personal and ’social’ life!

  123. March 18, 2009 at 11:26 am | #156

    That is great!

  124. March 18, 2009 at 11:33 am | #157

    what a dum*ss!

    serves him right for sharing too much on them intertubes

  125. March 18, 2009 at 11:55 am | #158

    Just remember that Twitter is a “pulpit” for you to speak to the world and have it recorded. The world includes your job and future jobs.

  126. Huey Newtron
    March 18, 2009 at 11:58 am | #159

    If you don’t have multiple, disjoint, disconnected personae on the web, you’re asking for exactly that sort of trouble.

  127. Ace
    March 18, 2009 at 12:03 pm | #160

    With every new social networking site, it seems like people forget their own net-etiquette. Happened with myspace to facebook, now twitter. Pretty sure this will never end.

  128. March 18, 2009 at 12:04 pm | #161

    Those who don’t learn from history… :)

  129. March 18, 2009 at 12:05 pm | #162

    I re-posted this with back links quoting the source.

    The blog: http://humor.talentspring.com/

    My blog is humor for recruiters, who work in the staffing departments of companies. They will love this!!!

    -Bryan
    Bryan Starbuck
    CEO, TalentSpring, Inc.

  130. March 18, 2009 at 12:05 pm | #163

    Mad. I mean – you wouldn’t scream from the roof of your house, via megaphone, that your neighbours smell – yet – digitize everything.. and people go nuts!

  131. merewald
    March 18, 2009 at 12:10 pm | #164

    Wow. I feel bad for that guy. I guess I’m going to need to censor my tweets from now on.

  132. Therese
    March 18, 2009 at 12:26 pm | #165

    This guy deserved NOT to get a job based on his stupidity. Did anyone read the story about how the Ketchum PR rep badmouthed the Fed Ex employees in Memphis? He got his butt handed to him. I’m a PR/marketing consultant and copywriter, and I just shake my head when I read stories. It’s called “social networking” for a reason.

    Thi guy caused himself a huge rash of bad publicity. Good luck – who wants to hire this guy now? Yikes!

  133. March 18, 2009 at 12:46 pm | #166

    Straight PWNAGE!!! What an idiot. Why would you ever say that, even if it was in an email?

    People need to realize that the internet is forever! Dummies.

  134. thormiller
    March 18, 2009 at 12:46 pm | #167

    Humm, I find this actually rather amusing. I don’t feel great about the person possibly losing their job, but why would you say something so private on a public space? This is sort of like all of the college students I go to classes with fiddling around on Facebook and Twitter during class, and then crying over bad test scores. Twitter and other social media sites have their place, but get a grip on when to use them!

    • Ace
      March 18, 2009 at 12:59 pm | #168

      Amen. Some people will never understand the power of the internet.

  135. emmarj
    March 18, 2009 at 1:03 pm | #169

    Wow. Hilarious as long as it’s not me.

    • redsoxmaniac
      March 19, 2009 at 12:10 am | #170

      I think people sometimes misappropriate the freedom of the internet with the semblance of its anonymity. Even without social media, I think the logical/illogical ( depends on who you ask ) decision of combining the internet with freedom and casualness is something that has been a no-no for a long time.

      I can bring back a story to my high school days when a group of upperclassmen developed a site that everyone just talked a load of crap. People were called ugly, private lives were brought into public domain, and users could post as anonymous. The site was shut down, but the repercussions were clear as two friends got into a fight over words said on the site, as well as another girl being outed as a lesbian.

      This isn’t a digression, but more of demonstrating that from the very beginning of most people introduced to the internet, there is a feeling of being able to rant without having to show one’s badge.

      Yes, many people can be anonymous. But as people utilize more applications, with careless movement, they are likely to end up in these situations.

      Think of how many Facebook pictures of drinking and durgs prohibits certain individuals from becoming politicians, or joining huge companies? How many public Tweets can hurt someone’s image ( even if it is based on intellectual, even honest viewpoints )?

      In a good way, I like the fact that people commit more of their personal life on the internet. It, at the end of the day, creates some kind of community. People in general should be more careful of what they say at all times regardless, but the lack of self-censorship does indirectly demonstrates a liberal community, as twisted as that may be.

  136. March 18, 2009 at 1:06 pm | #171

    What I think is even more amusing is the people who are defending @theconnor’s lack of common sense as being Cisco’s fault. That since she posted that tweet that Cisco should have thanked her for bringing this up and rewarded her for her candor.

    Give me a break! Most people are trying whatever they can to get a job and this person is whining about getting a job with a technology giant and a big paycheck? She needs to be smacked!

    And for those of you who agree with her: Grow up! There is no such thing as a truly anonymous venue, if you want to complain about something go and talk to your friends in person over dinner or over the phone. Not over a SOCIAL medium designed to show what you post to the world. If you do then take responsibility for your posts and don’t complain when someone smacks your hand.

  137. March 18, 2009 at 1:09 pm | #172

    Lessons Learned: Never say bad things about employers. In stead Love them, say you love to work for them. Keep this postive habit anywhere anytime, on twitter, outside twitter, and life is so much easier and relaxed….

  138. bowerbird
    March 18, 2009 at 1:34 pm | #173

    i’ve said lotsa things like that
    in a joking manner, so if i was
    this person, i would have just
    responded to levad’s reply with
    a tweet that reinforced the funny.

    does cisco have a sense of humor?

    -bowerbird

  139. suprieta
    March 18, 2009 at 2:38 pm | #174

    LMAO! These days, the lines are way too blurred.

  140. March 18, 2009 at 2:46 pm | #175

    I continue to be amazed at the lack of social media etiquette, good graces and common sense. I see former employees publicly burning bridges and vendors openly attacking one another in a childish manner all the time.

  141. March 18, 2009 at 3:10 pm | #176

    Ha, there isn’t one company in corporate America and beyond that seems to think Twitter is something the cool kids do, it’s something about that brand awareness check that leads to inexplicably revealing results in the blogosphere and “tweetosphere”, and really puts consumers opinions into greater perspective! Epic fail on behalf of the Twitter user making the mistake!

  142. triviumclassic
    March 18, 2009 at 3:43 pm | #177

    “Common sense” isn’t!

  143. March 18, 2009 at 4:20 pm | #178

    Good stuff, thanks for posting. I like the wittiness of the response too!

  144. helenalissi
    March 18, 2009 at 4:22 pm | #179

    That is nice!

  145. March 18, 2009 at 4:36 pm | #180

    By most people’s standards I am an old fart but I have to say, I wrote some really stupid crap when growing up and I’m glad I didn’t have the internet back then so that my utter drivel and idiotic mistakes didn’t end up on-line like this guy’s.

  146. feistygal
    March 18, 2009 at 5:01 pm | #181

    What a dork! If you are going to blab about your personal and professional life, you should be anonymous. Didn’t Dooce already warn everyone about blogging about your job?

  147. March 18, 2009 at 5:02 pm | #182

    I too am glad the internet wasn’t around when I was younger, if it had been, Lord help us!! LOL. Great blog – thanks.

  148. jensennz
    March 18, 2009 at 5:50 pm | #183

    So this means Cisco have a division or some guys just to monitor voices from the Internet?

  149. margiewrites
    March 18, 2009 at 6:12 pm | #184

    Just another example of someone tweeting way TMI. No, not everyone wants to read every thought that comes in your mind, or hear about every time you drink a cup of coffee or your cat does something “cute.”

  150. matzke
    March 18, 2009 at 6:48 pm | #185

    We were just discussing this today in a marketing roundtable-there is a very good reason not to drink and blog, tweet, post on a wall, etc. The best thing about our transparent world is that we have to discover our core values and declare how we want to present ourselves to the world.

    Cisco is probably better off not having a user in their employ when there are so many great people who would relish the opportunity to work.

    The concept of having your thoughts posted to the world should give everyone reason to stop and think “why do I have two ears and one mouth?”

  151. March 18, 2009 at 6:52 pm | #186

    I’m such an “epic fail” at twitter that I probably *COULD* tweet something like that and get away with it. If a tweet happens and no one sees it, was it really a tweet?

  152. jenniferjubilee
    March 18, 2009 at 7:14 pm | #187

    HAHA. The interwebz is a public place, ladies and gentlemen. (:

  153. Nathan Latka
    March 18, 2009 at 7:51 pm | #188

    This is EXACTLY what I just blogged about, except he is burning bridges before they are even built! (http://www.nathanlatka.wordpress.com/)

  154. Anonymous
    March 18, 2009 at 7:59 pm | #189

    This proves that the world is indeed small. We need to keep in mind that what we do or say in public (in twitter for example) may prove costly

  155. March 18, 2009 at 8:09 pm | #190

    It just goes to show you can’t be too careful!

    • Splotch
      March 23, 2009 at 11:51 am | #191

      It is NOT being too careful to not say stupid crap on the web if you dont want to!

  156. Luxun
    March 18, 2009 at 9:37 pm | #192

    How many people love to work? Just suck it up, she said “hating the work.”

    Big deal Cisco, maybe you should take that as an initiative to make the work environment more enjoyable. Hell why not supply a cable TV, a lap top with internet access, and some free KFC to your employees…oh wait… then it might not be work.

    You’re paying your employees because work isn’t fun and they have to have a reason to do it. If money grew on trees, would anyone like having a job at Cisco?

    Damn.

    • March 18, 2009 at 9:42 pm | #193

      At least their employee selection process failed to screen out someone who was quite unmotivated to work at the company.

      • Luxun
        March 19, 2009 at 8:41 am | #194

        Hahaha, good point.

  157. March 18, 2009 at 9:57 pm | #195

    thanks for sharing, Keep it up frend :)

  158. Lauren Hoff
    March 18, 2009 at 10:00 pm | #196

    Check out this opinion, and what the writer uncovered. http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/41777/114/
    I think it is important to note that the actions of people on the web were pretty horrible, and borderlined on harassment. Additionally, not many people are addressing the unprofessional manner in which the Cisco employee conducted himself.

    • Splotch
      March 23, 2009 at 11:48 am | #197

      True, and in a very legal sense, in this particular case, the Cisco “back channel” employee was wrong and illegally interfered with standard hiring practices and US labor law. That is a federal crime.

  159. jomatthews
    March 18, 2009 at 10:06 pm | #198

    Ouch! Like all social media sites, we must be careful in posting pictures and information! We must remember that all this information is open for everyone to see and there are no take-backs! lol

  160. March 18, 2009 at 10:43 pm | #199

    Excellent post!! Twitter is like a breath of fresh air on the Social Media scene. I have been on it for just a few weeks now and I have met several interesting people. It is a platform to network with people you would like to meet in real life. Check me out!!

    http://twitter.com/spryka

    • Splotch
      March 23, 2009 at 11:45 am | #200

      How are we to believe that Khurram is also spryka ?

  161. Anonymous Benz
    March 19, 2009 at 1:35 am | #201

    The Socrates Triple Filter Test

    In ancient Greece , Socrates was reputed to hold knowledge in high esteem.
    One day an acquaintance met the great philosopher and said, “Do you know what I just heard about your friend?“
    “Hold on a minute,” Socrates replied. “Before telling me anything, I’d like you to pass a little test. It’s called
    the Triple Filter Test.“

    “Triple filter?“

    “That’s right,” Socrates continued. “Before you talk to me about my friend, it might be a good idea to take a
    moment and filter what you’re going to say. That’s why I call it the triple filter test.“

    “The first filter is TRUTH. Have you made absolutely sure that what you are about to tell me is true?“
    “No,” the man said, “actually I just heard about it and…“

    ‘All right,” said Socrates. “So you don’t really know if it’s true or not. Now let’s try the second filter, the filter
    of GOODNESS. Is what you are about to tell me about my friend something good?“

    “No, on the contrary…“

    “So,” Socrates continued, “you want to tell me something bad about him, but you’re not certain it’s true. You
    may still pass the test though, because there’s one filter left: the filter of USEFULNESS. Is what you want to
    tell me about my friend going to be useful to me?“

    “No, not really.“

    “Well,” concluded Socrates, “if what you want to tell me is neither true nor good nor even useful, why tell it to
    me at all?“

    • Splotch
      March 23, 2009 at 11:43 am | #202

      Are you also saying that Twitter tweets can be hacked ?
      (therefor become not true)

  162. March 19, 2009 at 1:50 am | #203

    that would kill all the gossip in the world. :-)

  163. r
    March 19, 2009 at 3:49 am | #204

    very good

  164. March 19, 2009 at 3:56 am | #205

    A fine example of Natural Selection.

    Cork

    • Splotch
      March 23, 2009 at 11:39 am | #206

      Reminds me of the struck-by-vehicle-while-crossing-the-street- AND-texting/cellphoning issue – this is patently sad. Pedestrians have the right-of-way in ANY situation, unless they are Jay-walking (ALL Jay-walkers need to be ticketed, and if also texting/phoning, then THAT is natural selection; since they are walking like an odd bird and animals cant text nor phone)

  165. March 19, 2009 at 4:30 am | #207

    Priceless – but it must happen a lot

  166. March 19, 2009 at 4:39 am | #208

    Wow, that’s kinda crazy. Gotta be real careful what one says on the Interwebz. Big Brother is always watching…

  167. March 19, 2009 at 5:53 am | #209

    This is a perfect example of why you should never complain!

    With twitter let this be a lesson to all that your projection in life should always be positive.

    http://www.erinkhoo.com

  168. Anonymous
    March 19, 2009 at 7:22 am | #210

    Omg…I just joined Twitter 3 days ago and probably 90% of my tweets are about how much I hate my job. I’m going to erase them now.

    However, to be honest, I hate the fact that one cannot ever fully be self-expressive because people are always taking offense to everything. Maybe posting how I have zero work to do is not the smartest thing to do, but it should still be allowed.

  169. March 19, 2009 at 7:40 am | #211

    How moronic? What goes through their mind thinking that a company like Cisco won’t be monitoring the web?

  170. March 19, 2009 at 8:25 am | #212

    Thanks for the examples of What Not To Say. It seems as if technology brings out the Tourette in people. On a tweet or a blog the conversations are not private. Maybe one guide should be, “How hard will this bite me in the a@@?”

  171. lizriz
    March 19, 2009 at 8:29 am | #213

    What an idiot.

  172. Kat
    March 19, 2009 at 9:17 am | #214

    The twitterer’s problem wasn’t being too honest; it was being too SEARCHABLE. Substitute *** for “Cisco” and nobody would have noticed the tweet.

  173. March 19, 2009 at 9:42 am | #215

    its not just twitter dude, even our blogs are usually monitored…..a friend of mine had an issue when some HR from Oracle read his ideas on his blog, referred to the recruitment head and this fellow was scheduled for an interview, too bad he was sharing the ideas of the firm he was working for…….

  174. March 19, 2009 at 10:38 am | #216

    I’m not surprised at all. A lawyer once told me (referring to e-mails), “Only put in writing what you’d be willing to have read back to you in a court of law.” Good advice for any form of communicating, including social networks.

    Randolph Mase, Fiction Writer
    http://www.randolphmase.com
    http://twitter.com/randolphmase

    My Novels:
    Death on Broadway
    Death Beneath the Streets
    Death in Central Park
    Death in The Cloisters (under construction)
    Nathan Hale

  175. March 19, 2009 at 10:47 am | #217

    Ones lack of wisdom will always lead to his/her downfall. There is an old saying that goes like this “look before you leap”. it simply means one should think on our actions, speech and thought before they are executed, in whatever shape or form.

  176. March 19, 2009 at 10:50 am | #218

    But is it true? I checked the twitter page of the guy from Cisco and do not see the tweet in question

    • March 19, 2009 at 10:53 am | #219

      Thanks for the heads up Don. Yup, the whole thing is true – I blogged as a first-hand witness. My guess is Tim didn’t want any more publicity on this.

  177. March 19, 2009 at 11:39 am | #220

    It astonishes me that some twitterer’s are so flippant at naming companies and individuals

  178. March 19, 2009 at 11:46 am | #221

    I am annoyed that some NOSEY ASS person would have the balls to actually use the old “tattle tell” remark. What a douche!

    A more constructive thing to say would have been. “Hey man…be careful what you say. Anyone could be reading these…including your new HR manager!”

    C’est la vie!

  179. March 19, 2009 at 11:49 am | #222

    When are people going to realize that this information is “public”? I had a friend recently post on facebook “Glenda asked to be my friend. We haven’t been friends up to this point. Why start now?” She didn’t realize everyone could read what she had posted. People really need to be aware of what they are posting and who is able to read it.

  180. March 19, 2009 at 12:29 pm | #223

    Wow this is very interesting!! Yea i agree those kinds of things should be left private.

  181. moderncanvasart
    March 19, 2009 at 12:46 pm | #224

    Certianly a lesson to be learnt ! Oh dear !

  182. March 19, 2009 at 12:50 pm | #225

    yikes

  183. March 19, 2009 at 1:36 pm | #226

    much like the old saying goes that ‘if it’s not documented it didn’t happen’ but in reverse; if it is documented, then it’s assumed it DID happen. Do not put anything in writing anywhere on the net (Twitter, Facebook, My Space, Blogs, websites, anywhere!) that has the potential of coming back to bite you later.

  184. March 19, 2009 at 1:42 pm | #227

    Fifteen or so years in, I’m sure we’ve all done something just like this at one time or another…

  185. evershrike
    March 19, 2009 at 1:52 pm | #228

    Epic Fail. lol

  186. March 19, 2009 at 1:53 pm | #229

    That’s ridiculous, but it made me laugh. Social media is a great tool, but there are far too many people who aren’t using it properly. I believe it is the new way for people to air their dirty laundry. People used to just tell you too much too fast, now they share their TMI with the world. Hooray!

  187. marcovicario
    March 19, 2009 at 2:04 pm | #230

    ohhh

  188. Peregrine
    March 19, 2009 at 3:21 pm | #231

    WOW! The thing is, it’s not about the technology; it’s about common sense. Don’t say things in public that you would not want to be heard by the whole world.

  189. March 19, 2009 at 4:16 pm | #232

    Don’t ever talk about an employer on Twitter

  190. Tana Goldsmith
    March 19, 2009 at 4:57 pm | #233

    I liked this post. It hones in on the way people are dependent on networks like Twitter. I had a twitter account but almost lost it after three months. I asked myself what the point was of reading about micro moments in a stranger’s life.

  191. March 19, 2009 at 6:22 pm | #234

    A very painful way to learn your lesson well.

    But then, thanks for being the guinea pig. Now, all people like me who read this will not be terminated just before we start on a new job.

  192. March 19, 2009 at 8:23 pm | #235

    Exactly why my Twitter feed isn’t open to everyone — and I don’t automatically add people.

  193. March 19, 2009 at 8:41 pm | #236

    Hmmmmmm . . . you think if someone was to tweet that he desperately longed to work for Cisco that it might work in reverse?

  194. Krysta
    March 19, 2009 at 8:55 pm | #237

    Don’t tell or bring anything about Twitter. Besides it’s none of the employers business to know what I’m up to. They shouldn’t be nosy.

  195. Krysta
    March 19, 2009 at 8:59 pm | #238

    I’m not that interesting but boring.

  196. March 19, 2009 at 9:25 pm | #239

    It’s always interesting to me that the one thing people DONT want anyone to find is the first thing that pops up … but when you WANT something to be noticed on the internet, it gets buried…

  197. March 19, 2009 at 11:15 pm | #240

    *sigh*

    With so many folk so terrified of Big Brother watching them they seem to fail to realize that with Social Media everyone who wants to can watch them.

  198. March 20, 2009 at 7:55 am | #241

    Great post!

  199. March 20, 2009 at 11:17 am | #242

    made me think,thats takes doing,great post

  200. liv
    March 20, 2009 at 11:54 am | #243

    people shouldn’t be so foolish. it’s laughable.

  201. thegurlfrommars
    March 20, 2009 at 12:23 pm | #244

    That is a prime example of idiocy and tom-foolery at its best. Internal monologues should never come out as tweets!…or facebook statuses…

  202. Jill
    March 20, 2009 at 12:33 pm | #245

    He wasn’t right for the job anyway.

  203. Jill
    March 20, 2009 at 12:35 pm | #246

    It’s frightening how stupid these comments are. Not one original thought. Good thing you all have jobs.

  204. Amystoneus
    March 20, 2009 at 1:34 pm | #247

    Like being in a public place and thinking only the person you’re talking to will hear you; or picking your nose in traffic and assuming no one will see…. We can all hear you, and we can all see you.

  205. Sunshine
    March 20, 2009 at 1:55 pm | #248

    That guy was just an idiot. Any job in this economy is a blessing. If he didn’t want it then he should have never set up an interview.

  206. The Kid
    March 20, 2009 at 2:21 pm | #249

    I really love that Tim Levad is too retarded to end a question with a question mark.

  207. March 21, 2009 at 6:12 am | #250

    I know a ton of folks in Michigan who’d love that job.

  208. The Closer
    March 22, 2009 at 5:06 am | #251

    The potential for professionals to make asses of themselves with new technology just increases everyday.

    Cheers
    The Closer

    http://iloveclosing.com/2009/03/21/personal-hygiene-for-the-modern-sales-professional/

  209. Jaideep
    March 22, 2009 at 2:01 pm | #252

    Social media is an integral part of our profile – resistance is futile :)

  210. March 22, 2009 at 3:52 pm | #253

    This one is getting a lot of attention! Which is good, because the lesson is important.

    But I’m susprised that some people are blasting Tim Levad for his sound, cautionary response– some going so far as to say he is being intimidating. Geez. Sounds like paranoia…

  211. March 23, 2009 at 4:21 am | #254

    But the fact remains that CISCO does suck…

  212. March 23, 2009 at 5:49 am | #255

    Ties in with a previous posting of mine, before I’d ramped up my twittering (or it had gone mainstream) and so was focused on blogging. Its comments, however, are probably just as valid.

    http://euphemize.net/blog/archives/2007/10/29/professional-plus-blogger-equals-self-censorship/

  213. Splotch
    March 23, 2009 at 11:23 am | #256

    we dont see a problem here, and we dont use ANY blog, twitter, site nor fourm against nor in research of an employee for hiring purposes. The Supreme Court may deem that illegal – it isn’t currently illegal, but may be someday, so we dont use it in practice. Also, it takes twitter search to “lose” a deleted message about 72 hours once deleted. But, search WILL lose it eventually – that is a fact.

  214. Splotch
    March 23, 2009 at 11:29 am | #257

    Also, Social Media is social (media is secondary, merely the delivery method of the socialisms), therefore no different than what we might overhear in a bar or at a company picnic or in the lunch room – are those things said in those contexts used against employees or employers? Yes, they can be, so perhaps we should all treat twitter (non-private) as if it were a bookstore or bar or lunchroom or water cooler.

  215. Splotch
    March 23, 2009 at 11:33 am | #258

    Back to the public vs. private issue of twitter, I DO believe that twitter search should only be available to interactions between what a user tweets, DMs, DMs in response, and tweetsback/hashtags (when a username becomes a hashtag) – In other words, unless we OPT IN, our public tweets should not be searchable to anyone but ourselves; and a delete should be immediate (no excuse for that 72 hour wait IMEO)

  216. March 24, 2009 at 2:05 am | #259

    Hey nice read some definetely good info here. Rep given

  217. Greg
    March 24, 2009 at 11:13 pm | #260

    I’m pretty sure the guy/girl that posted the tweet wasn’t very tech saavy… haha

  218. dds
    March 25, 2009 at 4:18 pm | #261

    Hey, I need a job- I will gladly work at Cisco. Where do I sign? I have been out of work 7 months and I would be grateful for a job.
    People who make errors like she did may be the same ones with the talking problem in life- If you don’t want everybody to know it, keep it between you and your cat, dog or sister. Lessons learned.

  219. March 27, 2009 at 4:36 pm | #262

    Thx, nice post:)

  220. Robin
    March 28, 2009 at 4:50 pm | #263

    What if someone wants to ruin your career? What if they pose online as you and start saying things in your name?

    • March 29, 2009 at 6:09 pm | #264

      That is a scary thought, but it is possible.

      I think the employer in the story may have over-reacted..

      They hired the person, because of a skill match and some body else overheard the guy say that he hates the work (which btw, many, many people do!) and the hiring manager was / or was not influenced by this ‘overhearer’.

      If all work was fun, people would pay to do it. It is because most wor is difficult or stressful, frequently monotonous, that people are paid to work, and management keeps coming up with plans to motivate them.

  221. Rayn
    March 31, 2009 at 5:18 pm | #265

    I’m more tired with people like the Cisco employee with too much time on their hands.

    I love these company “snitches”. I love seeing the look on their face the moment their beloved company turns on THEM and kicks them out the door.

    Long live free expression and the freedom to be as stupid as you want!

  222. April 5, 2009 at 8:38 pm | #266

    Rather than make unnecessary posts on social networks such as blogs and twitter, post some of your achievements and success. Make it as your ally and not your enemy which will surely backfire you along the way.

  223. April 6, 2009 at 7:57 pm | #267

    Well, we’ve learned a very valuable lesson haven’t we? That’s why I keep my Tweets related to nothing that can be used against me in any way.

  224. April 14, 2009 at 10:02 am | #268

    Though a boneheaded move, I think there is a deeper message here.

    A company that has future employees talking about how much they will hate working there has serious issues. How did this person get such a bad impression of the company? She didn’t just come up with the opinion out of thin air.

    Obviously the “fatty paycheck” is to compensate for a poor work environment. Instead of issuing fatty paychecks, perhaps those extra costs should be rolled into projects that will make employees more satisfied to work there.

    You can always buy talent, but to keep them motivated you need to make them happy to work there.

  225. April 14, 2009 at 6:45 pm | #269

    that true!

  226. Mel
    April 23, 2009 at 9:34 pm | #270

    people must be careful in the things they say about their job or their boss in websites or social profiles.

  227. May 13, 2009 at 9:35 pm | #271

    So did Cisco learn its lesson from this and make the work less hateful?

    :D

  228. May 14, 2009 at 6:51 am | #272

    @Twitterer.
    :)
    That’s the best one yet!

  229. August 23, 2009 at 10:15 am | #273

    I wish I could tweet my way out of a job. At least then I could get unemployment and get away from my horrible boss at the Home Depot [redacted by blog author].

    Stuck Home Depot Associate

    • August 23, 2009 at 1:32 pm | #274

      Had to redact the Home Depot employee’s name – don’t need to settle scores here in the comments.

  230. September 9, 2009 at 11:45 pm | #275

    Thanks.. nice post

  231. September 22, 2009 at 11:35 pm | #276

    Lol sharing is a blessing and a curse.

  232. September 29, 2009 at 1:52 pm | #277

    Well, that was dumb of her. Thanks for the post.

  233. October 2, 2009 at 5:12 am | #278

    Cool Great!

    Thx, nice post :)

  234. Anonymous
    October 30, 2009 at 1:33 pm | #279

    truth is never wrong
    but there is a relative way to put things for the respective audience….the entire blue planet is not the place to talk in an untruthful way, but maybe be more polite in your semantic rhetoric…..and watch that syntax!

    No….I don’t practice that. lol .

    geek on that, bebe

  235. November 12, 2009 at 9:12 am | #280

    Wow that is pretty crazy, I guess people just figure the internet is so spread out that people wont notice. But we should all remember that there are applications constantly skimming for content and displaying it on other websites based off of specific keywords like “cisco” obviously a company like that keeps manages their public identity and tracks it. I wonder though if they figured out who the applicant was and were able to revoke their offer, I would think that to be unlikely seeing as they would not have access to the actual identity of the person unless their real name was attached to the account which is not very common.

  1. March 17, 2009 at 3:08 pm | #1
  2. March 17, 2009 at 7:04 pm | #2
  3. March 17, 2009 at 11:48 pm | #3
  4. March 18, 2009 at 1:22 am | #4
  5. March 18, 2009 at 1:50 am | #5
  6. March 18, 2009 at 3:42 am | #6
  7. March 18, 2009 at 3:52 am | #7
  8. March 18, 2009 at 3:58 am | #8
  9. March 18, 2009 at 4:01 am | #9
  10. March 18, 2009 at 4:12 am | #10
  11. March 18, 2009 at 4:26 am | #11
  12. March 18, 2009 at 4:36 am | #12
  13. March 18, 2009 at 4:52 am | #13
  14. March 18, 2009 at 5:06 am | #14
  15. March 18, 2009 at 5:09 am | #15
  16. March 18, 2009 at 5:11 am | #16
  17. March 18, 2009 at 5:49 am | #17
  18. March 18, 2009 at 6:11 am | #18
  19. March 18, 2009 at 6:17 am | #19
  20. March 18, 2009 at 6:18 am | #20
  21. March 18, 2009 at 6:43 am | #21
  22. March 18, 2009 at 6:57 am | #22
  23. March 18, 2009 at 7:05 am | #23
  24. March 18, 2009 at 7:14 am | #24
  25. March 18, 2009 at 7:22 am | #25
  26. March 18, 2009 at 7:28 am | #26
  27. March 18, 2009 at 7:37 am | #27
  28. March 18, 2009 at 7:41 am | #28
  29. March 18, 2009 at 7:50 am | #29
  30. March 18, 2009 at 7:53 am | #30
  31. March 18, 2009 at 8:01 am | #31
  32. March 18, 2009 at 8:03 am | #32
  33. March 18, 2009 at 8:26 am | #33
  34. March 18, 2009 at 8:38 am | #34
  35. March 18, 2009 at 8:52 am | #35
  36. March 18, 2009 at 8:53 am | #36
  37. March 18, 2009 at 9:04 am | #37
  38. March 18, 2009 at 9:06 am | #38
  39. March 18, 2009 at 9:16 am | #39
  40. March 18, 2009 at 9:19 am | #40
  41. March 18, 2009 at 9:28 am | #41
  42. March 18, 2009 at 9:44 am | #42
  43. March 18, 2009 at 9:45 am | #43
  44. March 18, 2009 at 9:45 am | #44
  45. March 18, 2009 at 9:48 am | #45
  46. March 18, 2009 at 9:53 am | #46
  47. March 18, 2009 at 9:58 am | #47
  48. March 18, 2009 at 9:59 am | #48
  49. March 18, 2009 at 10:17 am | #49
  50. March 18, 2009 at 10:17 am | #50
  51. March 18, 2009 at 10:19 am | #51
  52. March 18, 2009 at 10:21 am | #52
  53. March 18, 2009 at 10:28 am | #53
  54. March 18, 2009 at 10:30 am | #54
  55. March 18, 2009 at 10:30 am | #55
  56. March 18, 2009 at 10:31 am | #56
  57. March 18, 2009 at 10:31 am | #57
  58. March 18, 2009 at 10:50 am | #58
  59. March 18, 2009 at 11:36 am | #59
  60. March 18, 2009 at 11:36 am | #60
  61. March 18, 2009 at 12:32 pm | #61
  62. March 18, 2009 at 12:36 pm | #62
  63. March 18, 2009 at 12:45 pm | #63
  64. March 18, 2009 at 1:35 pm | #64
  65. March 18, 2009 at 1:45 pm | #65
  66. March 18, 2009 at 2:23 pm | #66
  67. March 18, 2009 at 2:54 pm | #67
  68. March 18, 2009 at 3:03 pm | #68
  69. March 18, 2009 at 4:22 pm | #69
  70. March 18, 2009 at 4:34 pm | #70
  71. March 18, 2009 at 7:40 pm | #71
  72. March 18, 2009 at 8:07 pm | #72
  73. March 18, 2009 at 9:39 pm | #73
  74. March 18, 2009 at 11:41 pm | #74
  75. March 19, 2009 at 12:51 am | #75
  76. March 19, 2009 at 12:52 am | #76
  77. March 19, 2009 at 2:44 am | #77
  78. March 19, 2009 at 2:56 am | #78
  79. March 19, 2009 at 4:11 am | #79
  80. March 19, 2009 at 5:13 am | #80
  81. March 19, 2009 at 5:35 am | #81
  82. March 19, 2009 at 5:53 am | #82
  83. March 19, 2009 at 6:01 am | #83
  84. March 19, 2009 at 6:18 am | #84
  85. March 19, 2009 at 6:26 am | #85
  86. March 19, 2009 at 6:40 am | #86
  87. March 19, 2009 at 6:59 am | #87
  88. March 19, 2009 at 7:04 am | #88
  89. March 19, 2009 at 7:14 am | #89
  90. March 19, 2009 at 7:21 am | #90
  91. March 19, 2009 at 7:25 am | #91
  92. March 19, 2009 at 7:58 am | #92
  93. March 19, 2009 at 8:24 am | #93
  94. March 19, 2009 at 8:27 am | #94
  95. March 19, 2009 at 8:36 am | #95
  96. March 19, 2009 at 9:00 am | #96
  97. March 19, 2009 at 9:18 am | #97
  98. March 19, 2009 at 12:33 pm | #98
  99. March 19, 2009 at 12:56 pm | #99
  100. March 19, 2009 at 1:05 pm | #100
  101. March 19, 2009 at 1:16 pm | #101
  102. March 19, 2009 at 2:06 pm | #102
  103. March 19, 2009 at 2:17 pm | #103
  104. March 19, 2009 at 2:41 pm | #104
  105. March 19, 2009 at 3:19 pm | #105
  106. March 19, 2009 at 4:56 pm | #106
  107. March 19, 2009 at 5:06 pm | #107
  108. March 19, 2009 at 5:08 pm | #108
  109. March 19, 2009 at 7:03 pm | #109
  110. March 19, 2009 at 9:36 pm | #110
  111. March 19, 2009 at 10:56 pm | #111
  112. March 19, 2009 at 11:02 pm | #112
  113. March 20, 2009 at 12:09 am | #113
  114. March 20, 2009 at 12:36 am | #114
  115. March 20, 2009 at 2:27 am | #115
  116. March 20, 2009 at 2:46 am | #116
  117. March 20, 2009 at 3:07 am | #117
  118. March 20, 2009 at 4:32 am | #118
  119. March 20, 2009 at 7:09 am | #119
  120. March 20, 2009 at 7:25 am | #120
  121. March 20, 2009 at 8:12 am | #121
  122. March 20, 2009 at 11:30 am | #122
  123. March 20, 2009 at 1:07 pm | #123
  124. March 20, 2009 at 1:08 pm | #124
  125. March 20, 2009 at 1:30 pm | #125
  126. March 20, 2009 at 6:13 pm | #126
  127. March 20, 2009 at 8:39 pm | #127
  128. March 21, 2009 at 6:15 am | #128
  129. March 22, 2009 at 2:58 am | #129
  130. March 22, 2009 at 3:23 am | #130
  131. March 22, 2009 at 7:40 am | #131
  132. March 22, 2009 at 8:31 am | #132
  133. March 22, 2009 at 9:20 am | #133
  134. March 22, 2009 at 9:13 pm | #134
  135. March 23, 2009 at 2:07 am | #135
  136. March 23, 2009 at 3:12 am | #136
  137. March 23, 2009 at 5:39 am | #137
  138. March 23, 2009 at 5:40 am | #138
  139. March 23, 2009 at 6:03 am | #139
  140. March 23, 2009 at 8:27 am | #140
  141. March 23, 2009 at 9:17 am | #141
  142. March 23, 2009 at 2:11 pm | #142
  143. March 23, 2009 at 5:43 pm | #143
  144. March 23, 2009 at 7:09 pm | #144
  145. March 24, 2009 at 1:19 am | #145
  146. March 24, 2009 at 9:54 pm | #146
  147. March 25, 2009 at 5:11 am | #147
  148. March 26, 2009 at 4:00 am | #148
  149. March 27, 2009 at 3:33 am | #149
  150. March 30, 2009 at 5:49 am | #150
  151. April 1, 2009 at 5:16 am | #151
  152. April 1, 2009 at 12:44 pm | #152
  153. April 4, 2009 at 3:01 pm | #153
  154. April 6, 2009 at 2:36 pm | #154
  155. April 14, 2009 at 9:49 pm | #155
  156. April 16, 2009 at 7:03 am | #156
  157. April 16, 2009 at 5:20 pm | #157
  158. April 20, 2009 at 3:59 pm | #158
  159. April 26, 2009 at 3:14 pm | #159
  160. May 6, 2009 at 6:11 am | #160
  161. May 10, 2009 at 5:04 pm | #161
  162. May 11, 2009 at 7:00 am | #162
  163. May 11, 2009 at 7:23 am | #163
  164. May 13, 2009 at 10:28 am | #164
  165. June 2, 2009 at 3:14 am | #165
  166. June 12, 2009 at 11:13 am | #166
  167. June 26, 2009 at 10:51 am | #167
  168. July 8, 2009 at 10:46 pm | #168
  169. July 21, 2009 at 11:29 am | #169
  170. July 28, 2009 at 5:44 pm | #170
  171. July 29, 2009 at 4:13 am | #171
  172. July 29, 2009 at 2:12 pm | #172
  173. August 9, 2009 at 7:11 am | #173
  174. August 9, 2009 at 11:19 am | #174
  175. August 23, 2009 at 4:16 am | #175
  176. September 25, 2009 at 4:41 am | #176
  177. October 5, 2009 at 9:42 pm | #177
  178. October 21, 2009 at 4:25 am | #178
  179. October 27, 2009 at 11:29 pm | #179
  180. November 11, 2009 at 6:15 am | #180
  181. November 11, 2009 at 6:32 am | #181
  182. November 11, 2009 at 6:35 am | #182